LAND VALUATIONS
FARMERS’ UNION PROPOSES UNIFORM SYSTEM NEW BASIS OF TAXATION Press Association WELLINGTON, Tuesday. Important proposals regarding land valuation Mere submitted by a special committee to the New Zealand Farmers’ Union Conference. Some amendments were proposed and these are to bo discussed with the Valuer-General before the report and recommendations are finally disposed of. The recommendations of the committee were as follow': (1) That present methods of land valuation should be replaced by a uniform system, inasmuch as land tax and all local taxation are based on the valuation. If the assessment of a valuation be erroneous or inequitable, then such unfairness is reflected in the assessment of local taxation.
(2) That the Valuer-General be asked to convene a conference during the winter of all Government valuers in order to lay down a uniform method of assessing land values. This conference should be convened at least once every five years. (3) That the basis of valuation be (a) in the main the productive value or carrying capacity of the land under average capable management. In assessing productive values and carrying capacities, the average of a period of ten years should be used. (b) The proximity of farms to ports, towns and townships, markets, railways, schools j and dairy factories. (c) Special con- | sideration should be given to rates, including special rates borne by each particular property valued. BASIS DECIDED UPON (4) That the valuation of the Lands Department and the Valuation Department be brought into line by putting into practice the basis decided upon by the conference of valuers. (5) That local authorities in a district be asked to nominate a local representative, preferably a farmer, to act in conjunction with the local Government valuer in assessing land values. (6) That a valuation of the farm lands of the Dominion should be completed at least once every ten years. (7) That income tax should be the only source of taxation, but that in the case of the farming community, exemptions should be made for the labour of members of the family engaged in farming. The differences in the methods of land valuation were mentioned by several speakers, who emphasised the need for uniform valuation throughout the Dominion. Mr. H. M. Rush worth, M.P. (Opua), said that production costs were a vital consideration. A farm might produce £I,OOO worth of produce, but the cost of production might also be high. Management, insurances, building construction and labour costs were all part of costs of an average farm, and had to be taken into consideration in order to arrive at the net annual valuation. As several amendments to the recommendations were proposed, it was do* j cided to defer further consideration i until the committee had conferred j with the Valuer-General.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300618.2.78
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1001, 18 June 1930, Page 9
Word Count
459LAND VALUATIONS Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1001, 18 June 1930, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.