Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“James” v. Sir Robert

■ N the evening of March 16, Sir Robert and Lady Moncrieffe and her niece were dining. The footman was out. I served the soup, and Sir Robert asked me what kind of soup it was. I answered that it was clear soup. He scolded me for not addressing him as Sir Robert, and threatened to kick me.” Sir Robert’s ex-butler, James Mitchell, made this statement, in evidence in the West London County Court, when he was claiming wages in lieu of notice, and also for a laundry Dill which Sir Robert had agreed to pay. James added: “I have served

Why the Butler was Sacked

uobilit.y and Royalty, and was never dismissed for impertinence.” Sir Robert, the eighth baronet, who contested the claim, told the judge: “Mitchell never showed respect. He never addressed me as Sir Robert nor Lady Moncrieffe as My Lady. He curtly told me it was clear soup, and shouted that, I was a pig. I told him to leave the room or I would kick him out. He went, down to Lady Moncrieffe and told her that, she was a perfect pig. I told him that he should know how to address a gentleman.” Mitchell denied having called anybody a pig. He simply said that Sir Robert treated him like a pig. The judge said that James had undoubtedly been impertinent, and was properly dismissed. Judgment was given for Sir Robert.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300503.2.192

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 962, 3 May 1930, Page 20

Word count
Tapeke kupu
239

“James” v. Sir Robert Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 962, 3 May 1930, Page 20

“James” v. Sir Robert Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 962, 3 May 1930, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert