Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NO COMPENSATION

BUS COMPANY CREDITORS DISAPPOINTED IMPECUNIOUS GOVERNMENT? Cabinet lias declined to compensate the creditors of the Mount Eden Bus Company, Limited (in liquidation) for the losses it suffered through the enactment of the Motor Omnibus Act in 1926. requiring the company to charge a penal fare, despite the fact that the Public Petitions Committee i of the House recommended favourable j consideration of the claim of £IO,OOO. In notifying creditors of Cabinet’s | decision, the liquidator. Air. G. Grey I Campbell, comments:—“The financial : position in which the Government ; finds itself has evidently influenced i Cabinet in its decision.” Intimation of the result of the | petition was received from the Minis- ( ter of Health, the Hon. A. J. StallI worthy, who presented it to Parliament, who expressed regret that Cabinet could take no further action. “I am keenly disappointed that the Government has found itself unable to give you more satisfaction in the matter, notwithstanding all the representations made on your behalf,” the Minister states. “It would have given me great pleasure to have advised you otherwise.” The liquidator has written to the creditors in these terms: —“It would appear that there is no possibility of obtaining any compensation from the Government. It was hoped that from this source something would have been obtained in order to pay unsecured

’ creditor® either the whole or portion of their account. I regret, therefore, having now to advise creditors that j they can expect nothing in settle- | ment of their claim. Xo effort was j spared by the committee of creditors and myself in the endeavour to secure assistance from the Government, and the fact that we got unanimous recommendation from the House indicated that our claim was considered a fair and just one.” The claim for compensation was based on the ground that, by having to charge the penal fare under the Omnibus Traffic Act, its business which commenced in October, 1925, was interfered with. The City Council acquired the company’s vehicles in 1927 for £15,427. which the company considered was below valuation. The company owed £12,550 to creditors when the business in the western suburbs section ceased, but when assets were realised there was nothing left to pay them.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300117.2.114

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 873, 17 January 1930, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
367

NO COMPENSATION Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 873, 17 January 1930, Page 10

NO COMPENSATION Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 873, 17 January 1930, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert