Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRUELTY TO ANIMALS

Sir, — Are fines sufficient to meet cases of deliberate cruelty to animals? Repeatedly we read of instances where callous cruelty is proved and, almost invariably, the punishment consists of a fine of £ 5 and costs. To my mind, sir, this is the wrong - type of punishment. If it is visited on, say, a man guilty of cruelty to his horse, the chances are that the animal itself will bear the punishment, as it will be worked harder and, probably, be fed more scantily to make good the loss to its owner’s pocket. In cases ot cruelty to small animals and pets, the punishment is not sufficiently salutory to convey a sharp lesson. lam for the revival of the whip as a means of dealing with the more serious offences of this kind. There is nothing like pain to bring men to their senses. OLD-FASHIONED.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300115.2.55.4

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 871, 15 January 1930, Page 8

Word Count
147

CRUELTY TO ANIMALS Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 871, 15 January 1930, Page 8

CRUELTY TO ANIMALS Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 871, 15 January 1930, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert