Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SELFISH LOVE

Mothers Who Are Exacting

CHILDHOOD’S RIGHTS “Every child should be treated as an individual, with potentialities, with the right to be loved, and taught how to love,” says Dame Henrietta Barnett. The right to be loved. “But I do love my child." says thg devoted mother, fiercely. "I worship him.” Yet I somehow do not believe that is the type of love to which Dame Barnett refers. I have seen so many savagely-devoted mothers, who denied themselves all manner of joy’s to shower their affection upon their sou and yet denied him the right to be loved, too.

Such a one is the mother who keeps her boy from school because she thinks the others are too rough, but who, in reality, knows that it would mean separation from her influence, the mother who, in her selfish adoration, wants her boy for herself and herself only, and loves him in a purely demanding and egotistical manner. . . . Children have the right to something more than that. They have a right to the sacrifical love which metes to them the best for their own future. Mothers may not realise it, but the very fact that they are mothers means that they have had their heydey. It is the new life which is entitled to the future that should not be kept close clenched in the mother’s palm. “My boy is going to be this, that, or the other,” declares mother. “He knows how much I want it.” Poor boy! brought up from the nursery with it being dinned into his little head. 1 love you so much, darling, you don’t want to disappoint me, do you?” What can he do? But that is not love, not tlje love the child has a right to demand; it is pure selfishness. LIVING ONE’S OWN LIFE We have each of us a right to our life. We are individuals, and the child, because he is a child, is no less an individual and no less capable of likes and dislikes and of making a choice. Loving guidance is a different matter from dogmatic persuasion. Mothers are dogmatic, they are persistent, and they have a wild desire to live their children’s lives for them. It cannot work. Later, a child has a right to love. He chooses his child friend, later he chooses his sweetheart. And how many mothers weep bitter tears and mourn and make life a misery for the boy. They persist that the girl is not good enough, that they will never be happy, that she is doing all this for his good. In reality what it really boils down to is that she does not like the girl. Sne wants to choose his wife as she has chosen his life. Mother wants to be a dominant factor in the boy's being, she cannot and will not take the back seat which will enthrone her for ever in his heart.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19291127.2.38

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 831, 27 November 1929, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
489

SELFISH LOVE Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 831, 27 November 1929, Page 5

SELFISH LOVE Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 831, 27 November 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert