“COLLUSION” TALK
LABOUR’S MOTION ON SALARY “CUTS” INDIGNANT DENIALS THE SUN’S Parliamentary Reporter PARLIAMENT BLDGS., Monday. Collusion between the Labour and United Parties on the question of the no-confidence motion seemed to be the favourite alle> gation made by Reform speakers during the discussion today. One speaker in particular, Mr. J. A, Young (Hamilton), aroused a stormol protest when he suggested that Mi. Holland’s motion was drafted in th* office of the Minister of Justice. The Hon. T. M. Wilford: I neief saw it. Mr. P. Fraser (Wellington Central), to Mr. Young: That is a deliberate —what it is. (Laughter.) Mr. Young said that he was only going by information he had. Government Members: Who is job informant? Mr. 'Wilford: I never saw or heart of the motion until I came into tin House at 2.30 today. Mr. Young accepted the Ministtrt assurance. Mr. Fraser: Why throw miseraHi suggestions across the floor of thi House? Both Mr. Forbes and Mr. Holland completely denied collusion.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19291105.2.63
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 812, 5 November 1929, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
164“COLLUSION” TALK Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 812, 5 November 1929, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in