Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MOUNT ALBERT ROAD

MOUNT ROSKILL BOARD CRITICISED BITUMEN BREAKING UP The roping off of the bitumen-sealed centre strip and the concrete paved roadway of the borough's side of the Mount Albert Road was one of the drastic proposals submitted to the coum il last evening to stop the break - ing-up of this section of the route b\the volume of traffic. Trenchant cirticism was levelled at the. Mount Roskill Road Board for its failure to improve the other side of the road. Declaring that the council would have to act quickly in undertaking maintenance of the central bitumen strip of the road, Cr. B. Brigham asserted that this section was fast breaking up under the volume of traffic it had to carry. Vehicles from Mount Roskill used the Mount Albert side of tho road, but the Alount Roskill side was a mass of ruts and clay. Tlio edge of the concrete paving was beginning to break away and unless this and the bitumen strip wero quickly repaired the ratepayers would bo involved in heavy expenditure. The bitumen strip had been laid down to carry the tram-lines when extensions were made, and was not intended to carr3' heavy traffic. He pointed out that because of the condition of tho road there had been 16 accidents on the route in the last few months. He advised that the route should be confined to one-way traffic. Cr. H. 11. Langley: We have liad to fight the Mount Roskill Road Board ever since the road was constructed, and ever3*one of our recommendations has been llouted.

When the roping- off of Mount Albert side. of the road was suggested, tho Alayor. Air. L. E. Rhodes, expressed the opinion it was too drastic. Ho strongl>* condemned the action of the Mount Roskill Road Board in not improving its side of the route, for which tho board had been offered either £2 or £3 for £1 subsidy for reconstruction work by the Highways Board, but the offer had not been accepted. Tho Highways Board, however, would not subsidise the Mount Albert Council in the maintenance of its side.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19291016.2.151

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 795, 16 October 1929, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
350

MOUNT ALBERT ROAD Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 795, 16 October 1929, Page 11

MOUNT ALBERT ROAD Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 795, 16 October 1929, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert