Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COMPENSATION CLAIM

ACCIDENT WHILE UNLOADING STEAMER WATERSIDER INJURED Alleging that as the result of an accident while unloading the steamer Golden State at Central Wharf on January 28, 1929, he was unable to continue his work as a waterside worker, Charles Boys asked for compensation from Leonard and Dingley, Ltd., from May 27, 1929, at the Arbitration Court this morning. Mr. J. J, Sullivan appeared for Boys and Mr. J. More represented defendant compar v. The .ppening of the accident was not in dispute, said Mr. J. J. Sullivan. It was simply a matter of medical evidence as to whether Boys had been prevented from following his usual occupation as a result of the accident.

Boys had been working on the wharf unloading the Golden State, and had had his two arms below a sling of cargo when it had been suddenly lowered, causing injuries to his arms and back. The defendant company had paid Boys compensation at the rate of £3 Ss 5d a week from the time of the accident until May 27, 1929. It was now contended that Boys, who had been in excellent condition before the accident, was unable to work in the meanwhile, and compensation at the rate of *£ 3 8s 5d a week was asked from May 27, and in addition, medical expenses were sought. Boys was now’ suffering from bone disease. Medical evidence was called to show that Boys had been in good health before the accident. Though he had suffered an accident in 1911, it had not caused any injury to his spine, as had happened now.

In evidence, plaintiff said he liad been making good money working in Auckland for some years before the accident last January. There had been a previous accident to his leg several years ago, but liis spine had not been affected. For the defence medical evidence was called to show that plaintiff was not a fit man before the accident, and that he should have recovered from its effects within six months. (Proceeding.)

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290904.2.96

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 759, 4 September 1929, Page 9

Word Count
337

COMPENSATION CLAIM Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 759, 4 September 1929, Page 9

COMPENSATION CLAIM Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 759, 4 September 1929, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert