Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“INSULT TO AUCKLAND”

MAKING CHILDREN STAND IN FULL TRAMS RESOLUTION RESCINDED The Transport Board’s recent regulation that school children holding concession cards must give up their seats to adults when tramcars are full was rescinded by the board at its meeting yesterday. is an insult not only to the people of Auckland, but also to the parents and teachers in our schools,” said Mr. L. E. Rhodes, who moved that the regulation be rescinded. “Boys should be taught to give up their seats j to their elders, but not by compulsion ' of the Transport Boai'd. and it has to be admitted that there are cases when children cannot be expected to stand as, for instance, when carrying a heavy case of books in one hand and a lunch-bag in the other.” ’ This clause is arbitrary, unfair ancl wrong in principle,” Mr. Rhodes continued. ’T do not think that it received due consideration when it came before the board on a previous occasion. It is not part of our duty to teach children manners, but to provide transport facilities; the other is the duty of the parents and school teachMr. E. 11. Potter, who seconded, said it was his experience that school girls were always willing to give up their seats when occasion suggested such an action. Mr. M. J. Coyle objected to rescinding a resolution once it had been passed. The clause had come from edLicationists themselves. TEACHING OF MANNERS “I support the motion because I think it is the duty of educational authorities to teach our children manners, and not this board,” said Mr G. G. Ashley. The chairman, Mr. J. A. C. Allum, said that if he had afiticipated so much trouble he would never have agreed to the clause. Mr. E. J. Phelan was opposed from the start because he felt girls should not be asked to stand. If the regulation applied only to boys he thought it would be supported unanimously. The motion to rescind was carried by six votes to three, those in favour being Messrs. Rhodes, Morton, Phelan, Ashley, "Wood and Potter, and those against Messrs. Allum, Coyle and Baildon.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290821.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 747, 21 August 1929, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
356

“INSULT TO AUCKLAND” Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 747, 21 August 1929, Page 7

“INSULT TO AUCKLAND” Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 747, 21 August 1929, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert