Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROTECTING ACCUSED

QUESTIONS ON CONVICTIONS The fact that an accused man, who enters a witness box to testify, cannot be examined concerning his previous convictions without the sanction of the presiding judge, was emphasised by Mr. Justice Ostler in the Supreme Court yesterday. His Honour commented upon the suggestion that once a man had been convicted that fact was not allowed to be forgotten in a court of law, but, said his Honour, that was not the case. “If a man gives evidence and holds himself out as a truthful witness, and he turns out to be a man with convictions for dishonesty against him, it is only right that the jury should know the character of the man they are asked to believe. For that reason only is the Crown Prosecutor allowed to crossexamine a person about his previous convictions.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290801.2.231

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 730, 1 August 1929, Page 18

Word Count
141

PROTECTING ACCUSED Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 730, 1 August 1929, Page 18

PROTECTING ACCUSED Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 730, 1 August 1929, Page 18

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert