Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REGULATION—NOT LAW

SUPREME COURT RULING Press Association PALMERSTON N-, Today. “In spite of the right-hand rule a man cannot drive on across an intersection if he sees that there is likely to be a collision,” said Mr. J. L. Stout, S.M., during a motor collision case at Palmerston North. “The effect of a recent decision by Mr. Justice Reed is that the rule is a traffic regulation only, and does not affect the common law rule as to negligence. Where the right-hand rule operates, a man coming in from the right must stop if there is likely to be a collision. He cannot carry on regardless of the traffic.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290718.2.139

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 718, 18 July 1929, Page 11

Word Count
109

REGULATION—NOT LAW Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 718, 18 July 1929, Page 11

REGULATION—NOT LAW Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 718, 18 July 1929, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert