Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IS MACHINE A SHOP

QUESTION FOR JUDGE CSpecial to THE SUN) DUNEDIN, Wednesday. Judgment was reserved at the Supreme Court at Dunedin when an inspector of factories appealed against the recent dismissal of a charge of keeping their premises open after hours against Hugh and G. K. Neil. Ltd., opticians and photographic suppliers. The firm in question had placed an automatic vending machine on the footpath. for the sale of two sizes of film, which could be obtained on the insertion of coins. The inspector maintained that, since the public had access to the machine at all hours, the firm was guilty of a breach of the Act limiting hours of busines.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290523.2.109

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 670, 23 May 1929, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
112

IS MACHINE A SHOP Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 670, 23 May 1929, Page 10

IS MACHINE A SHOP Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 670, 23 May 1929, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert