Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JURISTS NOT AGREED

DOMINIONS AND COURT (Australian and N.Z. Press Association) Reed. 11 a.m. GENEVA, Tuesday. The committee of jurists has not. reached an agreement on Sir Cecil Hurst’s suggestion that Dominion judges should be entitled to sit on the International Court. It expressed the opinion that the desired interpretation exceeded its mandate. It had been suggested by Sir Cecil Hurst that judges belonging to the same nationality as each disputant should he present on the court. He said several of the autonomous British Dominions, with separate memberships of the League, were rapidly developing their own national citizenship. If a case involving Canada were before the court, a Canadian judge should not be prevented from sitting on the bench because an England judge was on the court.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290320.2.96

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 617, 20 March 1929, Page 9

Word Count
127

JURISTS NOT AGREED Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 617, 20 March 1929, Page 9

JURISTS NOT AGREED Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 617, 20 March 1929, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert