Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Doctors Disagree

RAY TREATMENT CONTROVERSY

Research Council Assailed

(United P.A. —£>?/ Telegraph—Copgrigh f 1 (Australian and .V.Z. Press Association* Received 12.53 p.m. LONDON. Friday. THE condemnation of artificial-light, treatment by the Medical Research Council has roused the widest interest. While there is a chorus of disapproval of the council’s attitude, some Harley Street specialists advocate caution, pointing out that ultra-violet rays are often recommended and given by unqualified men.

The Ultra-Violet and Allied Trade i Association, in a statement, says the i successful use of rays on the King I illustrates the medical profession's well-founded faith in artificial sunlight. “Most of the doctors are fully alive to its benefits,” runs the. statement. “Will they stand by and see themselves made the laughing-stock of the world. The hospitals have spent thousands of pounds on artificial-light installations. Now, for the first time, we are told the same results are obtainable by the use of a mustardplaster.” The chairman of the Institute of Hygiene insists that ultra-violet rays are much more rapidly effective than mustard plasters, and relieve lumbago in ten minues, when plasters are not effective in ten hours. Dr. William J. O’Donovan, of the light-treatment department of the

London Hospital, describes the vouiicil's reference to cod liver oil as “a resurrection of one of the most ancient superstitions in medicine. It is an impertinence for anyone to say the hospitals should be called on to justify their expenditure of money on lighttreatment, since it developed from daily observation of its merits and cures, as emphatically demonstrated in types of cases previously uncured. One's respect for any scientific paper must be diminished by rhetorical comparisons between artificial light and mustard plasters. The King's physicians considered ray treatment valuable for his Majesty.” Dr. Alfred Cox, medical secretary of the British Medical Association, says the whole subject is at present in the experimental and research stage. The treatment has unfortunately been unduly boomed from quarters which are incompetent to speak with any pretence of authority.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290316.2.92

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 614, 16 March 1929, Page 9

Word Count
330

Doctors Disagree Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 614, 16 March 1929, Page 9

Doctors Disagree Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 614, 16 March 1929, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert