CONTEMPT OF COURT
OBSTACLE TO DISCUSSION OBSERVING THE LAW ISUS'S Special Reporter.) HAMILTON, To-day. Before the luncheon adjournment of synod. Bishop Cherrington said he had hoped to ask the advice of synod as to certain differences in the Hamilton district, but the chancellor had advised him that no reference could be made to them as it would be contempt of court. He had always tried to observe the law and to teach others to observe It, however grandmotherly it might be. Ho referred to a letter in a morning paper a few weeks ago, and said he was advised that it constituted contempt of court, and that he had cause for action, but of course he was not going to take any. He hoped a satisfactory solution of one of the chief difficulties would be found. He declined to say any more than that.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290313.2.6
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 611, 13 March 1929, Page 1
Word Count
144CONTEMPT OF COURT Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 611, 13 March 1929, Page 1
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in