AUSTRALIAN SPORTSMANSHIP
Sir, — I have read with disgust “Dinkum Aussie’s” reply to “Wisden.” It has made “Wisden’s” contentions even more obvious. He begins by classing him a “pommy.” I cannot see on what grounds. He then refers to Australia’s reputation for sportsmanship. He might remember that self praise is no recommendation. His excuse that the Englishmen were asking for it when they put Larwood on to bowl Ironmonger is a wretched one. His refer-
ence to the “all-conquering Englishmen” savours strongly of failure to give credit to the visitors. Next he accuses “Wisden” of gloating over England’s success. Where did he get this from? I saw no gloating in "Wisden’s” letter, nor anything to suggest that he was an Englishman. As to Australian cricket barracking, it is only humorous when Australia is winning. When Australia is losing it is decidedly hostile and a great handicap to a visiting team. There are Australians who firmly believe that England would never have won the Ashes if it had not been for Ponsford's injury. This, mark you, after England had won the first two tests! No, “Dinkum Aussie,” what your crowds do not understand is how to wfn'n Wh6n tl lf: y can do this they them 8 seein& themselves as others see PRO-WISDEN.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290306.2.81.4
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 605, 6 March 1929, Page 8
Word Count
211AUSTRALIAN SPORTSMANSHIP Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 605, 6 March 1929, Page 8
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.