CATTLE DOG OR POMERANIAN?
DIFFERENCE COSTS £1 7S 6D (From Our Own Correspondent) PAPAKURA, To-day. A little difference of opinion as to whether a dog was a pomeranian or a cattle dog led to the appearance in the Papakura Magistrate’s Court today of R. Piikington and E. Slater, for failing to register the animal. It was explained that the defendants went to the Manukau County Council’s office to register the dog as a cattle dog, the fee being lower than that for other dogs. The registrar, however, considered the animal was a pome.ranian. consequently it was not registered. The magistrate upheld the registrar’s opinion and ordered the defendants to pay £ I 7s 6d costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290123.2.120
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 569, 23 January 1929, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
114CATTLE DOG OR POMERANIAN? Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 569, 23 January 1929, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in