IS COMPANY A PLUMBER?
TECHNICAL DEFENCE RAISED (Special to THE SUN) NEW PLYMOUTH, Wednesday. Whether a company can be a plumber was discussed in the New Plymouth Magistrate’s Court to-day. Boon Brothers, builders, were charged with doing sanitary plumbing work without being registered plumbers. A technical defence was offered. There was no such firm as Boon Brothers, said counsel, as that firm had been formed into a limited liability company in 1915, the serving of the summons on Alfred Boon being therefore irieffective. It was also submitted that a company could not be a registered plumber because of the conditions imposed by the examination. All work done by the firm was under the charge of a registered plumber. Decision was reserved, the magistrate considering the points raised as important.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19281220.2.167
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 542, 20 December 1928, Page 17
Word count
Tapeke kupu
129IS COMPANY A PLUMBER? Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 542, 20 December 1928, Page 17
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in