Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

cv s> inmi'ute . 4 tikarCrfofmtS _ “Sj^lWar oitfS DIWARS WHISKY mr l© 3 jiort i SpiritSOLE AGENTS: HANCOCK AND CO.. LTD.. AUCKLAND ws IN A HALF POUND BLOCK # YOU GET MORE CHOC. .

UNITED STATES ELECTIONS Prohibition NOT A FACTOR Destitute of sound argument in favour of prohibition, the New Zealand Alliance makes the ridiculous assertion that Mr. Hoover’s Election as .President is a prohibition victory. In doing so the New Zealand Alliance is merely making a dying clutch at a flimsy straw. Not only must it be remembered that Mr. Hoover’s party has been returned in a majority at the last seven United States Elections; but it must be remembered that the prohibition planks in both the Republican and Democratic Parties' platforms were identical at this Election. Here are the planks:— SMITH’S PARTY ( Democratic ) “Speaking for the national Democracy, this convention pledges the party and its nominees to an honest effort to enforce the eighteenth amendment and all other provisions of the federal constitution and all law enacted pursuant thereto.’* HOOVER’S PARTY (Republican ) ** The Republican party pledges itself and its nominees to the observance and vigorous enforcement of this provision cf the constitution.” With these identical prohibition planks in their respective platforms the Democratic and Republican Parties voted practically the same as if the prohibition problem did not exist. These two Parties are not and never have been opposed on the prohibition problem, which cuts clean across party lines as in New Zealand. Both candidates for the Presidency had no option but to include enforcement planks in their party platforms, because prohibition had been embedded in the Constitution without reference to the people, and their oath of office gave them no alternative but to uphold the Constitution. The People of the United States have never had a chance to vote against prohibition. When the Canadians were given the chance, they repealed it. f It is only when a nation-wide referendum is taken for or against the repeal of prohibition, that the world will realise what a positive failure prohibition is. J And what did Australia say ? The referendum held in New South Wales in September, ONLY TWO MONTHS AGO, showed a majority of 527,957 FOR CONTINUANCE. Vote with the Empire for Temperance Vote Continuance

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19281113.2.112.1

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 510, 13 November 1928, Page 14

Word Count
373

Page 14 Advertisements Column 1 Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 510, 13 November 1928, Page 14

Page 14 Advertisements Column 1 Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 510, 13 November 1928, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert