MORE TAXES FOR FARMERS
Can this country stand the heavy drain that prohibition would entail? Are we such an irresponsible community that our laws are not stringent enough, and that we have to import the American idea of prohibition? These are questions that every thinking elector will find no difliculty in answering. The cost of living has increased wherever prohibition has been tried, heavier taxes have been levied in order to make up the deficit in revenue, farm lands have depreciated in value, and from every viewpoint, prohibition has been proved a colossal failure. The late Right Hon. W. F. Massey, who himself was a farmer, said: “The deficiency in the revenue caused by prohibition would fall on the people by way of all-round taxation.” The revenue derived from the sale of liquor in New Zealand amounts to over £1,900,000 per annum. and if prohibition were carried taxation on foodstuffs and other necessities would be absolutely essen tial In order to make up this sum. Not only so, but the Government would have to find another million at least for the purpose of attempting to enforce the law, and the farmer would have to bear his share. Increased land tax and heavier duties on agricultural machinery and implements would be almost certain to be imposed.—Advt.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19281015.2.111.5
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 485, 15 October 1928, Page 12
Word Count
215MORE TAXES FOR FARMERS Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 485, 15 October 1928, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in