Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WINNING A BRIDE

QUESTION OF PERJURY DEBATE IN COURT Because William Goodman, aged 25, of Leeds, England, wanted to marry Dorothy Webster Simpson, aged 18, an alliance forbidden by the girl’s parents, he made a false declaration as to her age. During his prosecution at the Police Court, counseil for the defence, a Mr. Sandelson, and the Magistrate began a debate as to the pros and cons of perjury In securing a forbidden but willing spouse. Mr. Sandelson urged that it was a case of reciprocal love between a young man and a girl of 18 whose parents had refused their consent to a proposal of marriage. Very foolishly Goodman had signed a declaration that Miss Simpson was 22, that he and she had been resident in Paris during the required statutory time, though neither had, and armed with this licence had been married at St. Luke’s Church. “From the dawn of man,” added Mr. Sandelson, “history is studded with instances of men committing follies for love.” The offence of perjury was only a technical one. The Magistrate: Love does not enter into this court, and it is absurd to describe the offence as technical. It was a deliberate act to obtain by fraud what he could not otherwise obtain. Mr. Sandelson: If the young people had come before you to obtain the court’s permission I think you would have granted it, as you have power to do.

The Magistrate: I do not know what I should have done, but the probability is that after hearing the parents’ objection I should have refused my consent. To guard against that refusal this oung man deliberately committed perjury. Mr. Sandelson: The couple were deeply in love with each other, and are very happy now together since their marriage on May 5. The trouble is that the girl’s mother had social ambitions for her daughter, and thought the defendant was on a lower level, but he is a very honourable man.

The Magistrate: He is very far from being an honourable man or he would not have done this. It is nonsense to talk like that.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19280917.2.106

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 461, 17 September 1928, Page 12

Word Count
353

WINNING A BRIDE Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 461, 17 September 1928, Page 12

WINNING A BRIDE Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 461, 17 September 1928, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert