SUPPRESSION OF NAMES
magistrate differs from JUDGE Press Association. CHRISTCHURCH, To-day. That discretion in regard to the sup?r®?s.t°n of names should be left to the Ataieial officer presiding over a court Dd not to the newspapers, was the ♦tssertion made by Mr. E. D. Mosley, in m °rning. He was considerng the case of a 17-year-old lad con0i assau:t on a female. When the same case was before the jjtipreme Court Mr. Justice Adams said rh r* the Question of suppression to e *Tess. Mr. Mosley commented n ° editor or reporter could be are of all the circumstances of all ases. He agreed to suppress the ames in the present case. Accused was convicted and dis-<-ha.rged.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19280821.2.112.4
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 438, 21 August 1928, Page 13
Word Count
116SUPPRESSION OF NAMES Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 438, 21 August 1928, Page 13
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in