Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POWDER-PUFF CASE

SETTLED OUT OF COURT The “powder-puff case,” which occupied Mr. Justice Reed and a jury in the Supreme Court yesterday morning, terminated abruptly when, after the luncheon adjournment, counsel effected a settlement out of court. The action was brought by E. B. Tolley and Co., of Sydney (Mr. McVeagh) against E. H. Little and Co. (Mr. Leary), for payment of a promissory note for £262 in respect of the sale of the lease of a factory and two shops in Auckland. The defendant counter-claimed £I,BOO, alleging misrepresentation. Part of the business concerned the manufacture of powder-puffs. Tolley was stated to have said that Little would have no difficulty in selling 14,500 puffs a week in New Zealand. Little found he could dispose of nowhere near the amount.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19280811.2.106

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 430, 11 August 1928, Page 11

Word Count
129

POWDER-PUFF CASE Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 430, 11 August 1928, Page 11

POWDER-PUFF CASE Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 430, 11 August 1928, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert