Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NAVAL BILL REJECTED

U.S. SENATE’S ACTION NOT DISCUSSED AT ALL (United P.A.—By Telegraph—Copyright J (Australian Press Association ) WASHINGTON, Saturday. The Senate to-day rejected the Naval Construction Bill by 44 votes to 22. There is little likelihood of the measure again coming up for consideration this session, as the Senate will on Monday consider a resolution passed by the House of Representatives asking for an adjournment of Congress on Tuesday. The rejection of the bill occurred under peculiar circumstances. Not only did it not receive lengthy consideration, but it was not discussed at all. Legislators are all anxious to leave Washington to “mend their political fences’’ before the party conventions are opened. The Senate dealt quickly with various measures. Much business wall be left undone when Congress is adjourned. On February 23, the Naval Committee of the House adopted a programme authorising the construction of 15 cruisers and one aircraft-carrier, as against the Government’s programme. The cost of the committee’s programme was estimated at £54,800,000. The committee also provided for the definite completion of the new ships. The first was to be laid down within three years from the passage of the Act, and all were to be completed within six years. The aircraft-carrier, 13,800 tons, was to be laid down in two years. The committee adopted a provision authorising the President to suspend the proposed construction wholly or partly if an agreement for a further limitation of naval arms should be reached at a future disarmament conference. The committee rejected the proposal for submarines on the ground that the United States already has more submarine tonnage than any other nation. The bill embodying the modified programme was passed by the Lower House in March. It is this bill which the Senate has now rejected.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19280528.2.96

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 365, 28 May 1928, Page 9

Word Count
294

NAVAL BILL REJECTED Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 365, 28 May 1928, Page 9

NAVAL BILL REJECTED Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 365, 28 May 1928, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert