Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

1928 OR 1929?

'THERE is a considerable amount •*- of doubt as to whether the Transport Commission will be able to report its findings by May 26, required by the notice setting up Questions are being asked whether it is May, 1928, or 1929. This is the sixth day of the actual sitting, and the first witness has now been in the box for five days. Several council witnesses, and others from outside local bodies, private bus companies and carriers have yet to be heard. Counsels’ addresses at the conclusion of the evidence will probably occupy two or three days, ar.d after that the commissioners have to reach an agreement and prepare a finding, which, in the light of past experience, wilt take several days to prepare, and a day or two to type.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19280507.2.123

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 347, 7 May 1928, Page 13

Word count
Tapeke kupu
133

1928 OR 1929? Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 347, 7 May 1928, Page 13

1928 OR 1929? Sun (Auckland), Volume II, Issue 347, 7 May 1928, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert