Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

late city

-WITHDRAW EPITHETS APPLIED TO DAWN”

AUTHOR deeply hurt

Pres. Association. — Copyright. * d . 1.10 p.tn. LONDON, Thurs. rue author of the "Dawn” film story, / Berkeley, in a letter to the “Daily c ites the Press praise of the and adds: "In ignorance of what “ortrayed. Sir Austen Chamberlain > l it ord Birkenhead have gone out /their wav to vilify the work of the surer Mr. Wilcox, and myself as pr °nuenant,’ 'unsavoury.' ‘hectic, ’ outrage on humanity,’ 'horrible,' s indecent.’ None of these epiare remotely justified. “Vothing has ever hurt me so deeply "to be condemned unheard by the rnment’s spokesmen, who are both miliar with my work in the cause of International appeasement “■Lord Birkenhead accused me of readne tainted money. Sir Austen chamberlain implied that the project As one in which a gentleman would ,he engaged. I appeal to Sir Austen chamberlain and Lord Birkenhead to Lhave like Englishmen and withdraw.” —Sun. JOURNALISTS APPROVE film not sensational LONDON, Thursday. The Nurse Cavell film “Dawn,” as tc which a storrp of controversy has teen aroused, was screened privately before a party of journalists. The »eneral verdict is that the picture is Jot sensational, but that Miss Sybil fhorndike’s acting is superb. The journalists also express the opinion that “Dawn” is a splendid eximple oC British cinematography. The Secretary of State for Foreign L/fairs, Sir Austen Chamberlain, stated •n the House of Commons that he had irritten on at least half a dozen occasions to British representatives, and hid approached the authorities of •oreign countries seeking the excision o f, or modifications in, portions of cinema films which appeared to be derogatory to British prestige.—A- and &Z.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19280302.2.115

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 293, 2 March 1928, Page 13

Word Count
277

late city Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 293, 2 March 1928, Page 13

late city Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 293, 2 March 1928, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert