Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RAILWAY STAFFING

MINISTER EXPLAINS BILL THIRD READING PASSED (THE SUN'S Parliamentary Reporter.) j WELLINGTON, Friday. j In moving the committal of the , Railways Amendment Bill in the House of Representatives this evening, the Alinister of Railways, the Rt Hon. J. r,. Coates, said it made no difference jin administration as far as transfer and promotions were concerned. The Bill followed the recommendations oi the committee set up to investigate ; this phase of the service. With these ; recommendations the Cabinet did not j agree entirely, but after consideration j it was thought best to give full effect i to the committee’s suggestions. In future all appointments would be I provisional and would not be made | final until all chance of appeal was re- j I moved. Regrading would take place | every five years. Air. Coates dealt with ! the constitution of the Appeal Board ; j of seven members, five of whom were ; |to be elected. He stressed the point ; , that they wanted a board that would , hold the balance fairly between the j ! men on the one hand and the public on : I the other. The chairman, lie thought, j should be a magistrate, unless there i was someone else satisfactory to both . parties. Air. Coates made it clear that it was not the intention to bring outsiders into the department if there was j ! anyone in the department capable of | • doing the work. He thought the Ap- ■ peal Boa.rd would work out satisfac- ! torily and that the railway associations i were not justified in their alarm. The Leader of the Opposition, Air. H. ; E. Holland, said he understood there I would be no appeal in the case of posi- ; I tions to which th< . ittached I i exceeded £765 a year, and he did not think that would be satisfactory. He j believed the service desired the presi ent chairman of the Appeal Board, a ; ! magistrate, to remain, and he saw no ! I reason why it should not be laid down I in the Act that the chairman should be a magistrate. • Air. Coates said that was the underj standing. | Then.” said Air. Holland, I take | it if the service wants a magistrate the Alinister will agree.” j Arr. Coates: Yes. The Bill was put through committee, i read a third time and passed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19271126.2.40

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 212, 26 November 1927, Page 5

Word Count
383

RAILWAY STAFFING Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 212, 26 November 1927, Page 5

RAILWAY STAFFING Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 212, 26 November 1927, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert