NEW ROAD TO PEACE OF WORLD

Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 200, 12 November 1927, Page 5

NEW ROAD TO PEACE OF WORLD

H. G. Wells Backs Kenworthy in Warning Against Crash of Civilisation AMERICA AND SIX POWERS COULD PUT END TO WAR A glimpse of the dangers lying in international rivalries , and the menace to civilisation of another Great War is given in the hook “Will Civilisation Crash/* hv Commander J. M. Kcnvcorthy. Brief cabled cxj tracts from this hook were published on Saturday last. H. G. Wells, the well-known novelist, in a vigorous article in an American exchange gives his benediction to Commander Kenworthy's hook. Lieutenant-Commander ICenwortliy is one of the most vivid and provocative member of the House of Commons. He qualifies great abilities by a certain tactlessness which has won him an unpopularity altogether beyond his merits. The other day, for example, when he was in America, he confided to an interviewer who quoted some trivial comment I had made upon the Labour Party, that I had “gone GAGA.” In that manner he made reference to my seniority of twenty years. He now asks me to say something for his forthcoming book. It is, I assume, a respite from the gaga sentence, and gladly do I halt on the road to Dr. Voronoff or the crematorium to salute the unmellowed vigour of my friend’s genceBook Summarises Forces that Make for War He has done a very useful, very competent, very stimulating book. I am happy to recommend it. I do not think it would be easy to better his summary of the complex forces that make for war in the world to-day. He has a good clear sense of fact and of the size of fact and the weight of fact, and if in his culminating chapter, “The Only Road,” he does a little seem to fade, it is only where we all fade. Because, although the omens of an other great war are as plain now as they were in 1907, the forces to which one can turn to stem the drift seem relatively even more confused and feeble than they were in the days when King Edward the Peacemaker flitted amiably about the Continent. David Lubin made his treaties for economic controls with every country upon earth, the League of Nations Society met thinly ever and again to hear the discreet counsels of Sir* Willoughby Dickinson and Aneurin Williams, and Sir Charles Walston preached a federal constitution for Europe. In those days one relied pretty much on the common sense of mankind. Thought Conflict Would Bring Permanent Peace I will confess I was taken by surprise by the Great War. Yet I saw long ahead how it could happen and wove fantastic stories about it. I let my imagination play about it, but at the bottom of my heart I did not feel and believe it would really be allowed to happen. I did not suspect that Lord Grey, the German Emperor and the rest of them were incompetent to that pitch. And when at last it did happen and that profession of ruthless insensitive mediocrities, the military profession, was given power for four years of stupid, clumsy and inconclusive massacre and destruction, I still clung to a delusion that at the end the common sense of mankind would say quite definitely, “Never again” to any such experience and would be prepared to revise its ideas of nationality, empire, loyalty, race competition and propagation, soundly and effectively as soon as it could for a moment struggle out of the mud and blood and reek in which it was entangled. 'Whether the phrase. ‘The war to end war,” was my contribution to the world or not, I cannot now remember. My mistake was in attributing any common sense to mankind. Suffering of Next Great Outbreak To-day the huge majority of people in the world think no more about the prevention of war than a warren of rabbits thinks about the suppression of shotguns and ferrets. They just don’t want to be bothered about it. It is amazing how they accept the things that will presently slaughter them. The other day my wife and I were sitting on the lawn of a pleasant seaside hotel. Charming young people in pretty wraps raced down to the water to bathe; others came chatting from the tennis courts. The seafront below was populous with a happy crowd, the sands gay with children. The faint sounds of a distant band on the pier were punctuated rath eft* quaintly by practice gunfire from a distant fort. About us, on chairs of the most comfortable sort, sat the mature and prosperous, smiling pleasantly at the three military airplanes that manoeuvred overhead. “Wonderful.” they said. Of the hundreds of people in sight then, manj’’ scores will certainly be killed in the horrible ways of war in the next twenty years. They will be suffocated by lethal gases, torn to ribbons by explosives, sent limping and crying for help with frightful mortal mutilations, buried and smashed and left to die under collapsed buildings. Many more will be crippled: most perhaps impoverished. But they weren’t worrying. They weren’t taking life as seriously as thatBritons Went to Useless Deaths Across the trim turf came a group of military officers discussing some oafish “idea” of a landing, of “operations,” and so forth, and casting no shadow at all upon the smiling people about them. Just the same fine sort of fellows they were, agreeably dullwitted, as sent hundreds of thousands of Englishmen to cruel and useless deaths in France. They passed, and we heard a note of anxiety from an adjacent bath-chair. So after all there was some one who saw it as well as ourselves. We listened, but it was only an old gentleman worried by the morning’s newspaper and troubled by another fall in the British birthrate. He was expostulating about it to his stout and elderly wife, who assented as by habit and seemed chiefly preoccupied with her knitting. “He did not know what the world was coming to,” he said. Lucky Old Boy! He never may. I doubt if there was a human being in sight who is ever likely to read Commander Kenworthy’s admirable chapter of the application of science in battle or his other on war in the air. and learn the pleasures awaiting those whose share in the next war may include a whiff of diphenyl chloroarsine. Perhaps they will know everything that is practically important about this delicious substance long before they know its name. They may then try to call it by some quite wrong name before they choke. It is very conveniently administered by air bomb in the form of an intensely irritating smoke that can penetrate most gas masks yet devised. Says the 1926 “Manual of Chemical Warfare,” by Commander Kenworthy: “In man slight and transitory nasal irritation is appreciable after an exposure of five minutes to as little as one part of diphenyl chloroarsine in 200,000,000 parts of air t and as the

concentration is increased the irritation shows itself sooner and in rapidly increasing severity. Marked symptoms are produced by exposure to one part of diphenyl chloroarsine in 30,000,000 parts of air, and it may be stated in general that this concentration forms the limit of tolerance of ordinary individuals for an exposure lasting five minutes. A concentration of one part in 10,000,000 will probably incapacitate a man within a minute from the pain and distress and nausea and vomiting accompanying an i exposure of from two to three minutes 13 this concentration . . . The substances I are generally used to cause such sensory irritation that a victim is unable to tolerate a respirator. Then the victim tears it off and the other gas with which the region has been soaked, killing gas, gets him. When the Lieutenant-Commander raised the question of teaching the use of gas masks to children in the infant schools during the debate on the air estimates in the House of Commons in 1927 he was greeted with laughter by the members present. Nothing could better illustrate the happy carelessness with which we move toward the next catastrophe. The air manoeuvres over London this last summer have demonstrated clearly that it will be almost impossible to prevent the copious gassing of that great warren within a few hours of the opening of any new European conflict of first-class rank. The gravest chapters in this book are not, however, the recital of tlie novel and enhanced horror, for civilians quite as much as for soldiers of the next war. but the excellent and disturbing study of the gathering rivalry of the United States and Britain in naval affairs, and the discussion of the possibility of a war between these two halves of the English-speaking world- “ Stupid Professionalism” The stupid professionalism of the experts is largely to blame, and the still more stupid readiness of the present Governments in both Britain and America to follow the lead of these obsessed gentlemen. Whether a war between the United State and Great Britain is to be regarded as a tolerable possibility does not enter into the philosophy of the naval monomaniacs on either side of the water- Their business is to make Britain “safe” from the United States and the United States “safe” from Britain, and they are quite capable of calculating upon Japan as an ally in such a war. The wholesome brotherly jealousy of our two peoples is to be fostered and inflamed in the cause of armament and preparedness to the fighting pitch. The rivalries of industrialists and oil manipulators are to be dragged into the elaborating quarrel. The reader must turn to LieutenantCommander Kenworthy’s book to realise how far this obscene foolery with human welfare has gone already, and how easily it may go further. I-Ie shows how step by step the trouble may be worked up until the two great masses of English-speaking people find themselves upon different sides in the alliances of a new war that will outdo all the destructions and miseries of 1914 as that outdid the Napoleonic wars. Very good and convincing, too, is the summary of the activities of the League of Nations, and the very complete demonstration that that illplanned and ill-supported assembly has fallen back even from the poor courage of its earlier enterprises. As a means of settlement for minor international difficulties, which the States concerned want settled, it lias a considerable usefulness, but as a guarantee against graver quarrels it is beneath contempt. It is more than useless because it is dangerous; a great number of people in Europe and America are persuaded that it is a sort of war preventive, and that when they have paid their subscription to a local branch of the League of Nations Union and been to a lecture or a garden party once a year under its auspices, they have done all that they can be reasonably required to do to secure world peace forever. Upon many such people the existence of the League of Nations acts as a mischievous opiate. Economic Alliance of Powers But when I reach chapter 19, which is to tell us what is to be done, I find, as I have remarked already, a certain fading in the tones of our author’s voice. He is for an alliance to suppress war; and he points out very clearly that the United States. Great Britain. Holland and Switzerland could prohibit war to all the rest of the world to-morrow—if they choose. Between them they control the finances of the whole world. No nations breaking the peace could hope for any financial help against their combined boycott. England, America and Holland between them control the greater part of the world’s supplies of petroleum, Russia being the only large-scale producer of oil in an independent position. England and Holland between them control the world’s supplies of cotton and copper, Russia again producing comparatively small quantities of cotton independently. England and France and Belgium, if she adhered, as is highly probable, control the greater part of the tropically produced edible fats. Most of the wool and jute is controlled by the British Empire. Without money, oil, cotton, wool, rubber, copper, zinc, jute, tin* or edible fats, no war on the modern scale could be waged for very long. A very large proportion of the meat and wheat of the world would also be controlled by this group of peacemakers. Do not let us involve ourselves in complications about aggressive powers or who is to blame in any war. To do so would simply be to cloud the issue. Let us in short simply put our collective foot down and say “Stop that war,” and it will stop. That is an excellent passage. It should be given out as a dictation lesson in every school in the Englishspeaking world. We, just ourselves, can stop war almost completely. War Potent States But who are “We?” America, Britain, Holland. Belgium and Switzerland, with France and Germany in accord, will be the reply. But in what form are they to do it? There

the Lieutenant-Commander boggles and /remain's vague. Because you see there is no way of getting these powers together except by getting them together, and that means a Federal merger of so much of their independent soverignty as concerns the foreign relations. Before we can have peace these powers must form a league to enforce peace. That means no tinpot debating society of every little State, big or little, barbaric or civilised, strong or feeble, at Geneva, with no powers worth speaking about, but a real permanent league and alliance of these, the only really war Xjotent States, a sincere surrender of independent action on the part of all of them for the general good. Well, not one of the communities named is even slightly prepared for such a step. It would shock them more than any declaration of war could possibly do. And until the common sense of these communities can be raised to the level of realising this, they will continue to drift as they are drifting to another shattering war catastrophe. 1 I suspect that the author of this book before me knows that as well as I do. But there is Hull to consider. What would happen to the Lieutenant-Com-mander’s majority if he advocated plainly and simply putting the Empire under a greater league? A phrase, now popular in America, seized upon him in the ensuing hesitation and was for the moment “the only road.” Yet it is not a road out or anything like a road. It is just another piece of empty, fruitless American “idealism” utterly worthless to the world at large. War is to be “outlawed.” A wonderful word! Senator Borah finds the phrase suits his voice, and I gather it has the approval of that champion international visitor and retriever of foreign orders and honorary degrees, President Nicholas Murray Butler. Between these gentlemen and Lieutenant-Commander Ivenworthy I note much friendliness and intimacy exists. He has been in windy unsubstantial company, where phrases and good feeling count for more than effective action. You are to “outlaw” war. You are just to make a treaty between the powers concerned saying as much —and there you are! You leave these powers completely untrammeled by their declaration. Indeed, you leave everything as it was before. But you say it. Houghton’s Proposal Lieutenant-Comma nder Kenworthy gives a treaty projected by Mr. Houghton. “speaking in his private capacity as a citizen”—and only so far in earnest —which is probably the most vacuous treaty every proposed. At present. peace, for an indefinite period, exists legally between all these great powers; nevertheless* a hundred years’ peace agreement between the United States and Great Britain, and perhaps other powers’* is to be signed with much fuss and ceremony—“in the most solemn manner.” I can see the impressive gatherings that could be imposed upon the affair, the parties, the megaphoned and broadcast speeches, the grip of hand and hand, the noble, rich, respectable emotions. I am sorry I cannot share LieutenantCommander Kenworthy’s faith in this magic word “outlawry,” and its stately solemnisation. I accept all his premonitions of another great war; they are only too convincing; but I believe that the ending of war is a far more complex, laborious and difficult task than such mere gesticulations as this imply. In the meantime the most effective resistance to the approach of another great war lies in the expressed determination now of as many people as possible that they will have nothing to do with it, that they will not fight in it, work for it nor pay taxes when it comes—whatever sort of war it is. Pacifism is very ineffective and has an unpleasant flavour if it is adopted after war has arrived: the time for active pacifism is while peace .still rules. The last war was a war to end war, and the politicians and statesmen have not made good. So now is the time for a great pacifist effort. Now is the time for people who want to delay and avert a catastrophe, before the more deliberate organisation of a world peace can be achieved, to make it clear that the war makers will have to reckon with defections. That is the really practicable anti-war measure to attempt now, but it is much more likely to lead to gaol than to impres--ive ceremonial junketings at the White House t .