Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“SAFETY FIRST”

LAWS FOR MACHINERY AN OVERDUE - AMENDMENT (THE SUN'S Parliamentary Reporter.) WELLINGTON, Wednesday. QAFETY first is the principle O which the Hon. G. T. Anderson says guided the Government in the planning of the Inspection of Machinery Amendment Bill, which was amended extensively in select committee recently, and which was brought down for committal stage in the House of Representatives this evening. Mr. Anderson said that there had been no amendment to this law since 1914, and the amendments made were really overdue. The progress made in machinery during the last decade had made them very necessary indeed. Safety first was now a world-wide concern, and the Bill was intended to make more drastic safeguards than were in existence. One of the main objects of the Bill was to clear the way for the consolidation of the law, which he hoped would take place next session. Mr. W. E. Parry said that he had a complaint for what did not appear in the Bill rather than what was embraced by the measure. For instance, no provision was made for the registration of enginedrivers. Mr. Anderson: I have seen the secretary of the Enginedrivers’ Association, and ho is satisfied with what I say. Mr. Parry did not agree with the existence of a. law which permitted the State to violate its provisions with immunity, but which imposed stringent restrictions upon private employers. This was permissible in the case of uncertificated enginedrivers. However, casualties had occurred with disconcerting frequency, and in almost every case which he could recall uncertificated enginedrivers were working in the interests of the State, yet the dependants of those who lost their lives in such accidents were unable to claim recompense from the State. He advocated the insertion of a clause making the Crown directly subject to the same restriction as the private employer. The Bill was sent into committee, and progress reported immediately. The committal stage will be taken later.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270929.2.199

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 162, 29 September 1927, Page 18

Word Count
324

“SAFETY FIRST” Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 162, 29 September 1927, Page 18

“SAFETY FIRST” Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 162, 29 September 1927, Page 18

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert