Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAXATION APPEAL

CHIEF JUSTICE’S DECISION (From Our Own Correspondent.) WELLINGTON, Wednesday. The Appeal Court to-day considered the case of the Commissioner of Stamps v. Olive Finch, an appeal from the judgment of the Chief Justice, Sir Charles Skerrett, in Wellington. The case set forth that respondent’s husband had spent £1,982 just before his death in improving the family home and the commissioner claimed this was a gift to the wife. The Chief Justice held that as Finch died suddenly when he might have expected to live many years, the expenditure was justifiable and for the husband’s own benefit. From this decision the commissioner appealed*

i :i- -> -i- -> -i- ri- ■> Mr. Fair. K.C., appeared for the ap--3 \ peliant, and Mr. Parry for the respon- • - fdent. | ] ©eeision was reserved j

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270929.2.129

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 162, 29 September 1927, Page 11

Word Count
128

TAXATION APPEAL Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 162, 29 September 1927, Page 11

TAXATION APPEAL Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 162, 29 September 1927, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert