Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PUPUKE WATER SUPPLY

PROPERTY-OWNERS’ CLAIMS WHO SHOULD PAY? (THE SI X'S Parliamentary Reporter) WELLINGTON. Wednesday. TP compensation is to be paid to those owners of property on the shores of Lake Pupuke who have suffered hardships through the restrictions of the Health Department, the local bodies concerned will be called upon to shoulder the responsibility. for the restrictions upon building permits in this area were imposed! in the interests of these bodies.

In explaining the position in the House the Minister of Health, the Hon. J. A. Young, said the restrictions on building on the land draining into Lake Pupuke were imposed by the Takapuna Borough Council, which is the local authority in whose district the lake is situated. The restrictions were imposed on the advice of the Medical Officer of Health for the district.

This action was taken with a view to conserving the purity and wholesomeness of the water drawn from the lake and in the interests of the residents not only of Takapuna Borough but also of the three other boroughs which receive their water-supply from the same source. Claim had been made by Mr. A. Harris, member for Waitemata, that properties, while bearing heavy rates, were made more or less valueless by the refusal of building permits.

Mr. Harris said if the State was not prepared to pay the compensation, legislation could be introduced to enable the four marine boroughs — Takapuna, Devonport, Birkenhead, and Northcote —to bear the compensation. The Minister said that the burden of Mr. Harris’s complaint appeared to be that the Takapuna Borough Council would be obliged to shoulder the responsibility of compensation if the owners could establish a claim, but it was clear that the restrictions had been imposed for the purpose of conserving the purity of the water supplied to four boroughs. It appeared to him, as far as the issue raised by Mr. Harris was concerned, that if compensation were to be provided, it should be provided by those who consumed the water, and not only by the Takapuna Borough Council. The question of legislation was another affair altogether, and before he would feel disposed to consider seriously asking the Government to introduce legislation, the request should come through the official channels of the local bodies concerned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270922.2.95

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 156, 22 September 1927, Page 9

Word Count
377

PUPUKE WATER SUPPLY Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 156, 22 September 1927, Page 9

PUPUKE WATER SUPPLY Sun (Auckland), Volume I, Issue 156, 22 September 1927, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert