Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT YET PAID

DERBY SWEEPSTAKE PEREGRINATIONS OF WINNING TICKET The £75,000 prize in the London Stock Exchange English Derby sweepstake has not yet been paid over, but it is expected that the matter will soon be settled satisfactorily to all concerned, says a London paper published early last month. The whole question to be settled is who should present the winning ticket which drew Call Boy. The ticket has had an adventurous career. It was issued, with nine others, to a London stockbroker, and passed on to a* Birmingham firm, Messrs. Edwards and Burbidge. They ' sold the other nine, and then the lucky one to Mr. William Jones, formerly a Birmingham man, but now a resident of Felixstowe. Mr. Jones in his turn sold half the ticket to Mr. Frank Curzon, the owner of Call Boy, and a quarter to a firm of London commission agents. So ; after all these ramifications the ques- ; tion remains, who should present the . winning ticket for payment? It is at the moment in the hands of a solicitor. There is no question as to to its genuineness. Meanwhile the question has arisen as to the effect of sweepstakes increasing the number of runners in the Derby—that is, owners running impossible horses because j there is a large prize for each runner. “We are ready to fall in with any suggestion that may be made to us i by the Jockey Club,” said Mr. J. J. Hamilton, the organiser of the Stock Exchange Mutual Subscription Fund. “The last thing in the world that we want to do,” he said, “is to interfere [ with sport, particularly with the Derby. No doubt the magnitude of the prizes given to starters in the last year cr two has been a factor in causing a number of horses to go to the post which- would not otherwise have started. That, of course, is not in the interest of sport, and that’s why we want to do anything we can to help.” |

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270802.2.61

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 112, 2 August 1927, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
332

NOT YET PAID Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 112, 2 August 1927, Page 6

NOT YET PAID Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 112, 2 August 1927, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert