BOUNDARY CASE
JUDGMENT AGAINST CROWN Judgment against the Crown was riven to-day by his Honour Mr. Justice Skerrett, Chief Justice, in a disputed boundary case. The suppliant was Robert S. Hand. The question in the suit was whether the Crown was entitled to revise the western boundary of the suppliant’s land. His Honour found that the suppliant *as entitled to possession of that part cf Lot 8 now in the possession of the Crown and which was part of his land as defined by Mr. Dawson’s survey, the precise boundaries to be denned if necessary and liberty to either Party to apply for that purpose. Judgment would be entered for the •uppliant for £2O damages to be reduced to £1 if within ten days from the date of this jtidgment the Crown undertook that it will forthwith after the final determination of the action above re-erect the fence in a proper banner upon the western boundary of the suppliant’s land, as defined by this judgment: the suppliant would have the costs of suit on the lowest scale with w itnesses’ expenses and disbursements.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270603.2.41
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 61, 3 June 1927, Page 3
Word Count
183BOUNDARY CASE Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 61, 3 June 1927, Page 3
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in