Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DR. FRANK CRANE’S DAILY EDITORIAL

BAD JOURNALISM (Copyright, 1927.) J RECENTLY read two articles which illustrate the difference between bad journalism and good. The poor article was by one who shall be nameless, and the good one was by Damon Runyon, a wellknown writer, and justly famous. Mr. Runyon was to report the Browning case, and in his first article about it he tells just what Browning’s real name is, and what the trouble is all about, and this not-withstanding the fact that everybody is supposed to know it. It shows that a good article in a newspaper ought to furnish in a resume all about a case, and not assume knowledge on the part of the reader which many readers do not possess. The poor article was one written about henequen. It goes on to tell all about henequen’s decline in Mexic* because of the great supply from the Philippine Islands. It discusses learnedly the whole matter, in which it says that every resident of Yucatan has a vital interest, and it is also of interest to the world. Notwithstanding there are thousands of people who do noi know what henequen is, the article never explains this matter. Of course, you can look up the word in the dictionary, and find out about it in the encyclopaedia, maybe. But newspaper readers do not have encyclopaedias and dictionaries handy always. The article should first have explained what It was all about. Too many newspaper articles are written oh the same theory that the negro barber had who once shaved Senator Mason, of Illinois. The senator had gone into a town in Southern Illinois to make a campaign speech during an election. He went into a barber’s! shop to get shaved and to change his collar. It was about noon. As the barber was shaving the senator, he said: “Senator, you oughta bin lieah this mornin’. Mr. Jones, of Kentucky, made the finest speech I ever heard He spoke for two hours. I could listen to that man all day. It was the most eloquenes’ speech I ever heard.” “Well,” said the senator, “I am sorry I wasn’t here: what did he talk about?” “Well,” said the coloured barber, scratching his head, “he didn’t just say.” Too many articles are written without justs saying what they are all about.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270603.2.171

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 61, 3 June 1927, Page 14

Word count
Tapeke kupu
388

DR. FRANK CRANE’S DAILY EDITORIAL Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 61, 3 June 1927, Page 14

DR. FRANK CRANE’S DAILY EDITORIAL Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 61, 3 June 1927, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert