Seizing a Car
PAYMENTS IN ARREARS RETURN ORDERED Claiming the return of a car purchased from defendant, and later seized by him, on a hire purchase agreement, James Avenel, contractor, of Auckland, proceeded against A. 33. Ward motor-car dealer, before his Honour Mr. Justice Skerrett, Chief Justice, at the Supreme Court this morning. Mr. M. H. Hampson appeared for plaintiff, and Air. 33. H. Northcroft for defendant. Plaintiff claimed that he had been promised a statement showing the arrears of his payments, and, while waiting for it to be sent to him, the car was seized by defendant. This was denied by defendant, who said that the car was seized on account of the arrears owing. • His Honour held that there had been a promise given to render a statement. Judgment was given for the return of the car, or, in default, £I7S. Costs were allowed to plaintiff.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270527.2.115
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 55, 27 May 1927, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
148Seizing a Car Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 55, 27 May 1927, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in