Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Two Co-Respondents

A PORTLAND DIVORCE SETTLEMENT REACHED Tht a Maori named Hakaraia and a man named George Rook had committed adultery with his wife was alleged by Neils Peter Hjalmar Pedersen in petitioning for a dissolution of his marriage with Violet Pedersen before His Honour, Mr. Justice Herdman at the Supreme Court yesterday afternoon. Mr. L. P. Leary appeared for petitioner, Mr. A. J. Moody for the respondent, and Mr. R. Singer for G. Rook. Petitioner stated that he was married to respondent in 1917 and had lately been living at Portland, where he was employed as a carpenter at the cement works. Returning to his home unexpectedly one evening, said petitioner, he saw a man climbing out of the bedroom window. His wife, who had refused to accompany him to a party that evening, was in bed. He chased the man, whom he recognised as George Rook, for some distance and then returned to his home and ordered his wife out of the house.

When accused of misconducting herself respondent started to cry, said petitioner, and said that she did not know Rook was coming to the house.

Later he heard that a Maori named Hakaraia had visited his house during his absence. He taxed the Maori about the matter and he not only admitted having committed adultery, but also signed a statement to that effect. At the request of his wife he agreed not to join Hakaraia in the proceedings providing she did not enter a defence. When she decided to defend the case he had no option but to join the Maori. At this stage a short adjournment was taken to enable the various parties to confer.

Following the luncheon adjournment Mr. Leary stated that a settlement had been arrived at.

His Honoyr gave permission for the case to be withdrawn.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270514.2.80

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 44, 14 May 1927, Page 9

Word Count
304

Two Co-Respondents Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 44, 14 May 1927, Page 9

Two Co-Respondents Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 44, 14 May 1927, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert