Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A SECRET PROCESS

held to be property liable to taxation That a secret process could be classed '* s Property, and so taxed under the Sta ®P Duties Act, was the effect cf judgment delivered yesterday y Mr. Justice Stringer in the Supreme L °urt. The case concerned an action ln which the New Era Printers and Ltd.. of Auckland (Mr. J ohnaton) appealed against assessment ° duty by the Commissioner of Stamp r * Paterson) on an agree*or sale of a secret process of frintinß- - ” on °ur said that by the agree - to Offset Press, Limited, agreed the Ito John B. Hobart, as agent for 8U a PPellants, a secret process for a TiulL not less tha « £ 30.000. The CorndeflJ?°^ er heW that the process was to r\T as Property and was liable uty a » on a conveyance on sale. Wheti CaSe raised two questions, firstly ith , er a secret process was properly £u ™ the meaning of the Stamp ies Act, and secondly, whether it

was assessable if admitted to be property. "Property as defined in the Stamp Act means every description of property, or proprietary right, and every estate or interest in property whether legal or equitable, and whether corporeal or incorporeal, and includes goodwill,” His Honour said. "This is as wide and as comprehensive a definition as could well be framed and it is difficult to imagine anything capable of being bought and sold which would not come within it.. "Authorities appear to me to establish beyond question that a secret process is property within the meaning of the Stamp Duties Act. In my opinion a secret process is not a thing in action inasmuch as it is not a thing recoveiable by action, and is in the physical possession of the owner so long, at any rate as he does not disclose it. it seems to me that while he retains the secret in his brain it is as much in his physical possession as anything in his pocket. For the reason given 1 am of opinion that the commissioners assessment was correct, and I Llie appeal is, therefore, dismissed with iio costs and disbursements.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19270428.2.182

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 30, 28 April 1927, Page 15

Word count
Tapeke kupu
356

A SECRET PROCESS Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 30, 28 April 1927, Page 15

A SECRET PROCESS Sun (Auckland), Volume 1, Issue 30, 28 April 1927, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert