Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN UNUSUAL CASE.

UNAUTHORISED EXPENDITURE BY COUNTY COUNCIL. Yv'anganui, April 27. Mr Kerr, R.M., gave his reserved decision to-day in the case. Hex v. .seven ex-members of the Wanganui County Council. The claims were to recover £9 ."is, an excess of unauthorised expenditure. The Magistrate decided that in the first item of sending a delegate to the conference, the Council was not acting in the execution of any of the requirements of the Counties' Act, nor doing anything which the Council was empowered to do. He gave judgment for £1 for the Department. In regard to the travelling expenses of the chairman to the Counties' Conference, the Magistrate found the expenditure justified and regarded the sum £o 5s as an authorised expenditure.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19150427.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXV, Issue 97, 27 April 1915, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
122

AN UNUSUAL CASE. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXV, Issue 97, 27 April 1915, Page 2

AN UNUSUAL CASE. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXV, Issue 97, 27 April 1915, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert