LAND AGGREGATION CASE
Per Press Assooutdon. Palmerston North, February 2G. In the Supreme Court iu the case of the Lands Department v. C. E. \'ilu, of Bulls, to compel the transfer of certain lands acquired under the Land Act, 1912, tin* Department’s counsel said a settlement had been arrived at. Vile had purchased a section in the Ohakea settlement, which he was not entitled to do, as at that time he was the holder of other settlement land. Vile satisfied the Depaitment that he had acted bona fide and in ignorance of the law, and he had since transferred the section to a person legally entitled to hold it. The Department agreed to withdraw the action., but were anxious that the public should realise the restrictions against aggregation of Crown or settlement land; also that the Depaitmcut was determined to enforce them in every case.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19150227.2.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXV, Issue 48, 27 February 1915, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145LAND AGGREGATION CASE Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXV, Issue 48, 27 February 1915, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in