Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CARPENTIER v. SMITH.

■PROGRESS OF THE FIGHT. ■/: " ■ [[By EIICHEIO TEI-KGaA^a—ftePTHIGHT jjfclTHD PrE»B AbbOOIATIO*?.! (Received 1.30 p.m.) London, July 16. The fight commenced with a clinch. Breaking away, Smith rushed sod swung low with the left, and was cautioned. Smith had a slight margin on the first round. The second was dearly Carpentier’s, and he had . Smith in difficulties in the third. Smith was cautioned for striking low with the- left. s Carpentier was immeasurably smarter and cleverer at footwork. In the fourth round Carpentior rushed in and sent in his right, landing fairly on the point, Smith sprawling on his bach for nine seconds, and the bell saved him. The fifth round was characterised by much holding. THE FOUL BLOW. HOSTILE CROWD FORCE SMITH TO LEAVE THE RING. (Received 1.45 p.m.) London, July 16. In the sixth round, Carpentior, feinting, cleverly brought his right across, narrowly missing Smith’s point, and was carried away hy the force of the blow and slipped on his knees. Before he could attempt to rise, Smith, unable to withhold his hand, delivered a right hand punch with great force on the back of the Frenchman’s neck. Corn, the referee, waved Smith away. ‘ ~ - Carpentior did not try to rise, and it was obvious lie was badly hurt. He was brought round after vigorous work by his seconds. The crowd was so hostile that Smith was forced to leave the ring.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19140717.2.49

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIX, Issue 73, 17 July 1914, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
234

CARPENTIER v. SMITH. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIX, Issue 73, 17 July 1914, Page 6

CARPENTIER v. SMITH. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIX, Issue 73, 17 July 1914, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert