THE ARMAMENT QUESTION
ARMAMENTS QUESTION.
A MEW THEORY.
| By Elbotiuo Telegraph-Copyright]
[United Press Association j
London, January 9
Rear-Admiral Sir Reginald Enstance states *that the armour ol a Dreadnought can easily be perforated hy primary guns at fighting range#' while it is thicker thati necessary to exclude projectiles of secondary guns. If the'armour could be reduced without impairing the fighting efficiency, a great saving would lie possible, but the naval authorities of the various Powers naturally shrank from an initial step involving such great responsibility.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19140112.2.40
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 10, 12 January 1914, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
85THE ARMAMENT QUESTION Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 10, 12 January 1914, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in