Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TWO LIBEL ACTIONS.

BOGUS BIRTH NOTICE. [By Electric Telegraph—Copyright] [United Press Association.] (Received 10.5 a.m.) Melbourne, November 26. An unusual type of libel case has ‘ egun at the County Court. Florence label Webbe, of Waverley, Sydney, laimed £IOOO from the newspaper, he Age, as damages for libel. The facts were that Mrs Webbe, ivmerly a Miss Hobson, married Nich alas Percy Webbe, a professional short hand writer, formerly a member of the federal Hansard staff and a wellmown oarsman, on January 8, 1912 (bout June, 1912, Webbe and wife noli up their residence 'at Waverley lydney. They had no children, bul n March 24, 1913, a death notice ap reared in the Age purporting to an ounce the death of an eleven month: 'd son of Webbe and his wife at thei esidence at Waverley. Plaintiff’s counsel said the advertise • ert conveyed the "impression that r hild had been born about April, 1912 nd it might convey -the impress!or- ■ hat misconduct had taken place be ween Mr and Mrs Webbe before mar

■ The defence was that the advertise lent was-not defamatory either t hose knowing nothing of the parties ;r to those intimately acquainted wit. hem .The Age received a copy of the dvertisement purporting to he signed y J Nicholas Wobbc, and taking it ar .emiine, inserted it.. Plaintiff gave evidence that she haot authorised the advertisement i ny form. < Her husband’s signatnr n her marriage.certificate was noth ng like thd signa't'iire on the advertise.heht;’' ’ ’ •Edward Shaw’, handwriting expert 'ave evidence that'he thought sighm uros of Nicholas 'P. Webbe oil tin register and On the l tw opies of theiadvertisemenf were 'writ en by the sfimb 'man. '*• *’ •• The case viashtdfburned’. ■ • It is *sfai -1 that the jsaihe iidverdisementC^p>earod in the Argus. DENHAM V. FERRICKS. (Received 10 a.ra.) Brisbane, November 26. In the libel action, Denham v...E,er •ick«, defendant, denied t|i,4t whfjiSgh vas - returning thaWjvs afj(,£he dSfdir. Ition of the polil;,[.hft charged Deubar vith using Gorermnent ;■ .Rioneyf. «(!t----fight the Labour-Party. What he/fitti vas that the public mioney had (bne ised. He referred to Denham’s us )f special traiWSrv*'A i mTWS7S7''*TTOS?r' examined, said a' at)t reported the remare accurately 'To never nade by the press. He quoted train ictiOns by Denham Brothers to slipv. that the present system of distributio ,vas a large factor in the increased mst of living.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19131126.2.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 73, 26 November 1913, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
389

TWO LIBEL ACTIONS. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 73, 26 November 1913, Page 2

TWO LIBEL ACTIONS. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 73, 26 November 1913, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert