AN UNFAVORABLE CRITIC.
| Mr i Filson Young, in the Saturday Review, states His opinion that the | worst said against the “Tango” is justified, if not on the score of impropriety, certainly on the score of ugliI ness. “The other night,” he writes, , “J. saw an old lady of distinguished lineage and high station, and strictly I conventional views, sitting in a ball1100m and regarding with an expression (if fond and doting pride her honorable daughter, a sylph-like and relined young woman, tightly clasped in the embrace of a man and whirling about in various attitudes any one of which, Ia ad they jointly assumed it in the middle of a Loudon street, would have rendered them liable, to arrest on a charge of misdemeanor. That is a simple historical fact which should be placed on record, not because it is isolated, but because it is typical. And' my chief reflection, as I observed various graceful and good-looking people performing these antics on tne ballroom floor, was that if they coulcf see what they themselves looked Ijlce, especially from behind, they would in- ' stantly and for ever abstain from the 1 Tango, and all kindred dances. These dances have been the regular attraction in various Montmartre cafes for several years ; and women of the world I who have wished to see that kind of i life have had tobe warned, when they : wore taken to such places, that they 1 must 1)8 prepared for a very different i standard of propriety from that to : which they were accustomed. • It I certainly never occurred to me when 1 have looked at such performances that I should see them translated to 1 a’fashionable London ballroom, with peeresses and ambassadors, and dukes and princes, looking on an applaud--1 nig. And even if 1 had been prepar- | ed to see the younger and gayer married women so performing, with the countenance of their husbands and ! their friends, I certainly never exj peeled to see the mothers and chaporions of unmarried girls wreathed in smiles at the sight of their charge,? similarly occupied,”
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19130930.2.34
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 25, 30 September 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
347AN UNFAVORABLE CRITIC. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 25, 30 September 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.