CORRESPONDENCE.
POLITICS, PROHIBITION.
CAN SUCH THINGS BE? [To The Editor Stratford Post.] Sir, —I am perturbed and shaken, not to say alarmed. Can it be possible that dear old Sole—paragon of political pow-wowers, and potentate, vmh out whose permission no Minister would once have dared visit this Shakespearian (or Baconian, shall we say) hamlet, can he, 1 say, have been flattened out, winded and utterly extinguished by a mere Reform Secretary. If ho has not got the knockout blow, can you tell, I nray, why one Boyle leaps thus lightly into the frying pan ? Certainly he may be sorry too—later on—but a course of Boyle-Sole, under the circumstances promises to be a disli of flavour: choicest of Billinsgate. Whew! But what about Sole? Odds fish, boil me!—l am, etc., A PERRY WINKLE
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19130929.2.32
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 24, 29 September 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
132CORRESPONDENCE. POLITICS, PROHIBITION. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVII, Issue 24, 29 September 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in