THE APPEAL COURT.
GLAYLE v. RIVERSDALE CO-OP. [Per Press Association.] Wellington, July 1. The Appeal Court lias commenced. The case of Arthur Harvard Glayle v. the Riversdalo Co-operative Dairy Factory Company, Limited, came before the Court in the shape of cross motions for judgment and a motion for non-suit in an action for libel. The matter complained of was certain words and figures purporting to be the result of tests taken from samples of A. Willcock’s milk. Plaintiff was share milking with Willcocks, and was solely responsible for milk delivered to the factory. The non-suit points were that there was not sufficient evidence to show the jury that the words and figures complained of were published of and concerning plaintiff; that the inuendo alleged was not justified by the words and figures complained of; and that there was no evidence that the defendant was aware that plaintiff was share milking with Willcocks. Argument is proceeding,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19130702.2.21
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVI, Issue 48, 2 July 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
155THE APPEAL COURT. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVI, Issue 48, 2 July 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in