Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Second Edition MARCONI ENQUIRY.

POULSEN’S REPLY. [By EijEcxbio 'Teleguaxh—Coi'Yeight] [IJifITED PIiESB..ABSOOUf :«<•>'. I London, .April 22, ’ '• Mr..Rhse, Poidsen’s solicitor, flatly denied Mr Godfrey. Isaac’s.t suggestion that Ppulsens engineered the, press and Ministers in a campaign against.' the Marconi system.. v He, - denied everyfact that Mr Godfrey Isaacs produced regarding;-.the press campaign. He added that ...Major ,', Archer Shee refused, a financial, interest,, apd was merely told • the .facts regarding, the Poulsen' system. ,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19130423.2.39

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 90, 23 April 1913, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
70

Second Edition MARCONI ENQUIRY. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 90, 23 April 1913, Page 6

Second Edition MARCONI ENQUIRY. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 90, 23 April 1913, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert