"IN THE KING’S NAME.”
SYDNEY GOVERNMENT HOUSE. 'By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.) (United Press Association.) Sydney, February 26. Argument was concluded and judgment reserved in the Government House case. Counsel for the Citizens’ Committee argued that as the Governor was the Imperial Officer and representative of the King, and the Crown set apart land for his residence, such residence came within the category of Imperial property, with which the Colonial Government has no right to interfere. it was vested in the Ring in regal capacity, and was the nation’s property. As to the argument that the court was not constituted for reviewing the policy of the Government, Ministers must not forget that they were not a Jaw unto themselves.,i The sooner they understood that they must not act unlawfully the better.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19130227.2.26
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 49, 27 February 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
129"IN THE KING’S NAME.” Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 49, 27 February 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in