Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE HOME RULE BILL.

DISCUSSION IN THE LORDS. (Received 10.20 a.m.) London, January 28. Earl Grey, in the House of Lords, said that as a convinced Federalist, he strongly opposed the Home Rule Bill. He preferred that Ulstermen in the north-east be given self-govern-ment similar to that prevailing in Ontario. Nationalists in the West and South should have the same rights as the men of Quebec. It was imperative in the Empire’s interests that the question should bo settled on lines satisfying to the democracies in the selfgoverning Dominions and the United States. Lord Dulitaven said the Bill was incompatible with Federation, and imposed no adequate check on order and Hibernianism.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19130129.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 26, 29 January 1913, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
111

THE HOME RULE BILL. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 26, 29 January 1913, Page 5

THE HOME RULE BILL. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXV, Issue 26, 29 January 1913, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert