THE TRIAL OF DR. CLARK.
A MODERN BLUEBEARD. (By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.) (United Press Association.) Calcutta, December 13. Clark’s son, aged 23, gave evidence that he had the powders mentioned by Bibu analysed. They were declared to be slow poison. He asked his mother to go away with him, and she refused. He knew Mrs. Fulham was wealthy. His father did not love his wife and children, and was always running after other women. Ho abused and struck his mother. The prosecution interjected that they would produce Mrs. Fulham’s letter, found in Clark’s possession, confirming that the powders were poison. Mrs. Wieles gave evidence that Clark told her numberless times that he wanted to get rid of his wife, as he loved two other women.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19121214.2.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIV, Issue 93, 14 December 1912, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
124THE TRIAL OF DR. CLARK. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIV, Issue 93, 14 December 1912, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in