Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC.

THE QUESTION OF FLOGGING. (Received 8.5 a.m.) London, November 29. The House of Lords agreed to the second reading of the Criminal Law Amendment Bill. Lords Haldane, Canterbury and Lansdowne supported flogging. Lord Crewe opposed it and preferred indeterminate sentences. Lord Lytton objected to flogging and favoured braiding male and female procurers. Lord Alverstone favoured flogging. He had known criminals to howl even when sentenced to flogging.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19121130.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIV, Issue 81, 30 November 1912, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
70

WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIV, Issue 81, 30 November 1912, Page 5

WHITE SLAVE TRAFFIC. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXIV, Issue 81, 30 November 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert